- What did you do well in your essay?
- What were the weaknesses in your essay?
- What grade would you give your essay?
Take a couple minutes and analyze this image.
How is the class going for you? What can we do to make it better?
1. We live in a Visual Culture
We live in a visual culture. We are saturated in images at nearly every moment of our waking lives. For this reason, it is important to develop critical thinking skills that allow us to read images. I challenge you to engage with images actively instead of passively. Take the images apart in order to understand their messages. Accept, reject, or qualify those claims.
This week, you can find an image you find interesting or provocative in some way to use for your weekly journal response.
2. Visual Media as Texts
Learning to read images, deconstruct, and engage with them will make use better readers of texts, and vice versa.
Visual materials that accompany written arguments serve several purposes. First, they appeal to the reader’s emotions. While images can be logical, they first appeal to the senses of the reader before they are analyzed more logically. In other words, their immediate impact is more on the viewer’s heart than the mind.
Pictures can also serve as visual evidence, establishing proof that something occurred or appeared in a certain way. Pictures can help clarify data with graphs and tables and can also be used to confuse or trick an audience with graphs and tables.
Pictures can add humor or satire to an argument.
Visual images can be read as text, as such we need to think critically about them. Looking closely we can discern not only what they show but also how and why.
Appeals to Emotion
Images can be used to instill an emotional response in the audience. Even implied images in text can be very emotionally powerful. A description of blood stained clothes draws certain emotions in a reader.
Lawyers know how important visuals can be. They dress their defendants in suits and ties to make them seem more credible.
Types of emotional appeals:
- appeal to pity
- appeal to fear
- appeal to self-interest
- identity prejudice
Would you persuade, speak of Interest, not Reason. – Benjamin Franklin
Seeing vs Looking
“Seeing is a physiological process involving light, the eye, and the brain” (144).
“Looking is a social process involving the mind” (144).
Seeing is denotative, literal.
Looking is connotative, figurative.
The example of book gives is of an apple. The difference is the definition of an apple versus what that apple represents or symbolizes in our society.
What do apples signify in our society?
Page 147 in our textbook has a checklist for analyzing images.
Images as Arguments
Images can be used to help us see the argument that the author is intending. They can be used to lower our skepticism, visual proof of something that happened. This is problematic nowadays with the popularity of programs such as Photoshop, where images can be changed or manipulated. Now more than ever, we have to be weary of taking images at face value. We have to critically think about images and their intended effect.
Three basic questions we can ask.
- Who produced the image?
- Who distributed the image?
- Who consumed the image?
Our textbook suggests a rule for writers. If you think that pictures will help you make the point you are arguing, include them with captions explaining their sources and relevance.
I Have a Dream Speech
The now famous speech “I have a Dream” by Dr. Martin Luther King was aided by visuals when it was delivered.
He is at the Washington Monument, speaking to hundreds of thousands, smiling and waving. Behind him is the Lincoln Memorial.
This image shows him speaking with people and some police behind him. The image you choose to use will add meaning to your text. Be careful which images you choose.
What does it say if we use his mug shot from one of the many protests he was arrested at?
Or this one.
Have you ever seen this image of Dr. King?
Or this one?
The image your choose can help your audience understand your argument.
Take a couple minutes and analyze this image.
2BR02B – Vonegut
We read the short story 2BR02B for today. Let’s break it down so we can talk about it.
Who are the characters? What is the dilemma?
What do you think should be done?
Do you agree with the outcome?
Essay 2: Rhetorical Analysis
You will argue for your interpretation of the text.
A rhetorical analysis of a text examines a text rhetorically. The meaning of the word text depends on how creative you want to get. A text can be a book, article, consumer product, movie, advertisement, or commercial, to name a few. For this assignment you will pick a text, define, describe, and analyze the rhetorical context and/or argument the text is making. All texts have an author or authors and are created with a purpose. A rhetorical analysis helps us to understand the purpose it was created for and what it is saying or arguing.
Consider the ethos, pathos, and logos of the text. What appeals are being used in the text you are analyzing? Ethos – appeals to character. Pathos – emotional appeals. Logos – appeals to reason and evidence.
What to look at for a Rhetorical Analysis
- Consider the topic.
- Consider the audiences of the text.
- Consider the author.
- Consider the medium and design.
- Examine the language.
- Consider the occasion.
Be specific when referring to your text. Have the text in front of you if you can. Then you can reference specifics and avoid generalizations.
- 1500 to 2000 words in length
- 3 to 5 credible sources
- Works Cited
- Image of text or the advertisement itself as featured image
- Clear thesis and introduction
- Use of ethos, pathos, and logos
- Well-supported claims
- Specific references and details from the text
- A conclusion tying together your analysis
Remember, this is a formal assignment, make sure you are using appropriate tone and diction! Talk about the text, not what you think about the text!
Let’s look at a speech and then we will do a rhetorical analysis.
“Intellectual empathy requires us to think within the viewpoints of others, especially those we think are wrong” (Elder and Paul).
This is a very difficult thing to do. To try to understand others viewpoints is hard because it requires us to move past our own thinking. But it is crucial in developing as a critical thinker.
To empathize means to not assume that your perspective may not be the most reasonable one. Trying on other perspectives helps us better understand the world. You should not be afraid to engage with opposing viewpoints, this is valuable to you because you gain new insight and expand your views.
But how can we practice this?
Look for example where someone disagrees with you or you disagree with someone else’s position.
Try to accurately state their position. You can ask them if you stated it correctly.
You can also ask someone you disagree with to state how they understand what you are saying.
Notice when people distort your position or if you distort their position.
Strategies for Empathizing
When you disagree, switch roles with someone. Try to see it from their point of view. Try to better understand one another.
Summarize what the position is. You first need to understand what they are actually saying, otherwise this could be a fallacy.
When reading, try to think about what the author is saying and why? Do not assume they are wrong, try to understand why they have that position.
- Read Chapter 5, Writing an Analysis of an Argument
- Reading Journal 3 Due Thursday